MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Fuzzy Algebraic Structure Consists of Homomorphism via Multi-Fuzzy Set Applied to Cubic Vague Subbisemirings Over Bisemirings

2025· article· W4415914285 on OpenAlex
D. Mahendar, M. Palanikumar, Aiyared Iampan, Masum Raj

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicFuzzy and Soft Set Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThailand Science Research and InnovationUniversity of Phayao
KeywordsHomomorphismIntersection (aeronautics)Simple (philosophy)Fuzzy setAlgebra over a fieldSet (abstract data type)Algebraic structureAlgebraic number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discussed that the concept of multi-fuzzy cubic vague subbisemiring (MFCVSBS) is a novel generalized hybrid structure of vague subbisemiring. The MFCVSBS and level sets using MFCVSBS of bisemirings are discussed. We define some simple operations on them, including intersection and Cartesian product, to discuss some of their basic properties under MFCVSBS. It is assumed that \(\mathcal{Z}= \langle \coprod_{i}\circ\bar{\aleph}_{\mathcal{Z}}, \coprod_{i}\circ\beth_{\mathcal{Z}} \rangle\) is the multi-fuzzy cubic vague subset of k. Assuming that any non-empty level set \(\mathcal{Z}_{(\zeta,\sigma)} (\zeta,\sigma \in D[0, 1])\) is an SBS, it can be demonstrated that \(\mathcal{Z}\) is an MFCVSBS. It will be demonstrated that MFCVSBS is both its homomorphic image and pre-image. Examples are given to illustrate our conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it