MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415923733 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-24869-w

Deep reinforcement learning-based intrusion detection scheme for software-defined networking

2025· article· en· W4415923733 on OpenAlexaff
P. Ramesh

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningIntrusion detection systemDenial-of-service attackScheme (mathematics)Adaptation (eye)Network securitySensitivity (control systems)Anomaly-based intrusion detection system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Intrusion Detection Scheme (DRL-IDS) for Software-Defined Networking (SDN) which combines the Long-Short Term Sequence Recurrent Neural Network (LFTS-RNN) with the Particle Cloud-Integrated Joint Time- and Feature-Optimization Algorithm (PC-JTFOA). The hybrid model aims to enhance the security of SDN through the detection and mitigation of a wide array of Distributed Denial of Service attacks and network misbehaviors across different SDN planes. The LFTS-RNN is used for accurate attack detection and misbehavior identification. Meanwhile, the PC-JTFOA optimizes feature selection, load balancing, and energy-efficient routing, thus ensuring fast and reliable network traffic management. The deep reinforcement learning approach further enables continuous adaptation to changing network behaviors, thus making the model dynamically adapt to known as well as emerging attack vectors. The proposed DRL-IDS scheme obtains superior performance in experimental results based on the NSL-KDD and WPPD datasets. The LFTS-RNN model indicates a highly impressive sensitivity of 98.67% and specificity of 97.42%, while the DRL-IDS model presents an detection accuracy of 99.85%. The PC-JTFOA further improves the solution by exhibiting a low response time of 1423 ms, which indicates tremendous improvement in computational efficiency. A comparative analysis with the existent intrusion detection methods pointed out that the scheme proposed not only outperforms other models in terms of detection accuracy as well as adaptability, but it also reduces complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207