MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415924768 · doi:10.1103/ygqn-kjvb

Fully programmable plasmonic <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi mathvariant="script">PT</mml:mi> </mml:math> -symmetric dimer with epsilon near zero and phase-change materials for integrated photonics

2025· article· en· W4415924768 on OpenAlexaff
Shahab Ramezanpour, Amr S. Helmy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurabilityPlasmonPhotonicsDissipationCoherent controlHybrid systemPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As photonic systems progress toward enhanced miniaturization, dynamic reconfigurability, and improved energy efficiency, a central challenge endures: the accurate and independent control of optical losses and resonant properties on scalable, CMOS-compatible platforms. To address this challenge, we present a hybrid plasmonic dimer that functions in a non-Hermitian regime, capitalizing on the synergistic interplay between epsilon near zero (ENZ) materials and phase-change materials (PCMs) to achieve superior reconfigurability through electrical modulation. Our approach harnesses non-Hermitian physics by precisely modulating the loss differential among coupled modes alongside their resonant frequencies, thereby steering the system to an exceptional point (EP) characterized by emergent phenomena and enhanced perturbation sensitivity. By integrating ENZ materials to control dissipation with PCMs to fine-tune resonant frequencies, our structure achieves robust programmability---delivering at least 16 distinct operational states for coupled resonators. This capability supports deep subwavelength confinement and transitions between EP and non-EP regimes, while the inherently low power consumption of ENZ materials and PCMs under deep-subwavelength confinement offers significant advantages even in high-dimensional configurations. We believe that this work outlines a significant route for next-generation programmable photonics, delivering subwavelength confinement, energy-efficient operation, and high-dimensional optical reconfigurability within an integrated, scalable, and manufacturable platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207