MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415927330 · doi:10.15353/hi-am.v1i1.6829

Data-driven approach for predicting abnormal grain growth in sintered binder jet steels

2025· article· W4415927330 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingzhang Yang, Mohsen K. Keshavarz, Mihaela Vlasea

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Holistic Innovation in Additive Manufacturing (HI-AM) Conference · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSinteringPorosityJet (fluid)Grain growthProcess (computing)Grain sizeCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Austenitic 316 stainless steel printed by binder jetting requires sintering to high densities to minimize porosity and have the corrosion resistance and strength required for most applications. While sintering can achieve densities above 99%, this paper reports the occurrence of abnormal grain growth (AGG) in this high-density region. A comprehensive process map is proposed, integrating key parameters to predict and inform grain sizes using regression model and machine learning approaches. Additionally, a clear relationship is identified between surface roughness, density, and grain size, offering a potential strategy for quality monitoring in serial production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Holistic Innovation in Additive Manufacturing (HI-AM) ConferenceSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207