MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Extensive ischemic change on stroke presentation is uncommon: A population-based study

2025· article· en· W4415930595 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yasmin Aziz, Achala Vagal, Heidi Sucharew, Brady J. Williamson, Vivek Khandwala, Lily Wang, Rebecca S. Cornelius, Mary F Gaskey-Shipley, Thomas A. Tomsick, David T. Wang, Shantala Gangatirkar, Thomas Maloney, Paul S. Horn, Mary Haverbusch, Janice Carrozzella, David Robinson, Robert J. Stanton, Eva Mistry, Brett Kissela, Pooja Khatri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthShionogi
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Stroke (engine)Ischemic strokeClinical trialDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and prognosis depend on the extent of ischemia sustained at time of presentation. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is used for anterior circulation stroke triage and decision making. We sought to determine the distribution of baseline ASPECTS at a population level. METHODS: Clinical imaging was collected from hospitalized AIS patients ascertained in a metropolitan population of 1.3 million as part of the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study. Patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) in 2015 within 24 hours of anterior circulation ischemic stroke were included. Events were excluded if last known normal (LKN) was unavailable, occurred in the inpatient setting, if CTH was unavailable, or if a previous ischemic event was already adjudicated during the study period. Blinded central neuroradiologists evaluated presenting ASPECTS. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥6 was used as a surrogate for large vessel occlusion, as routine baseline vessel imaging was performed inconsistently during the 2015 study period. RESULTS: Among 1,518 events of AIS presenting within 24 hours of LKN, 949 were anterior circulation first-time events with baseline ASPECTS status available, of which 520 (55 %) had baseline vessel imaging. Among these 949 patients (mean age 71 [SD 14] years, median ED arrival time 5.2 [IQR 1.3-13.2] hours, median NIHSS 4 [IQR 1-9]), 920 (96.9 %) had an ASPECTS ≥6, of which 844 had ASPECTS 9-10. Of the 373 patients with a NIHSS ≥6 at presentation, 344 (92.2 %) had an ASPECTS ≥6. Of the 150 patients presenting with NIHSS ≥6 beyond 6 hours of LKN time, 129 (86.0 %) had an ASPECTS ≥6. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, most patients presenting within 24 hours of LKN had ASPECTS ≥6. Even in patients with NIHSS ≥6, only 14 % of patients presenting in the extended time window had ASPECTS <6. These results can inform resource utilization and clinical trial design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207