MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415945904 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1875

The GECKOS Survey: resolved, multiphase observations of mass loading and gas density in the galactic wind of NGC 4666

2025· article· en· W4415945904 on OpenAlexaff
David B. Fisher, Robert J. Elliott, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Michael R. Hayden, Marie Martig, Andrew Battisti, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, Alberto D. Bolatto, Toby Brown, Barbara Catinella, F. Combes, L. Cortese, Timothy A. Davis, Éric Emsellem, Dimitri A. Gadotti, Claudia del P. Lagos, X. Lin, Antonino Marasco, Eric W. Peng, Francesca Pinna, Thomas H. Puzia, Luiz A. Silva-Lima, Lucas M. Valenzuela, Junzhi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersElitenetzwerk BayernHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeNational Institutes of Natural SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science and Technology CouncilAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloGovernment of Western AustraliaNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și DezvoltareCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCHIST-ERAAustralian GovernmentEuropean Regional Development FundCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryEuropean School of OncologyStudienstiftung des Deutschen VolkesScience and Industry Endowment FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGalaxyOutflowGalactic haloHaloGalaxy formation and evolutionActive galactic nucleusFlux (metallurgy)Ionization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present a multiphase, resolved study of the galactic wind extending from the nearby starburst galaxy NGC 4666. For this, we use VLT/MUSE observations from the GECKOS program and H i data from the WALLABY survey. We identify both ionized and H i gas in a biconical structure extending to at least $z\sim$ 8 kpc from the galaxy disc, with increasing velocity offsets above the mid-plane in both phases, consistent with a multiphase wind. The measured electron density, using [S ii], differs significantly from standard expectations of galactic winds. We find electron density declines from the galaxy centre to $\sim 2$ kpc, then rises again, remaining high ($\sim 100-300$ cm$^{-3}$) out to $\sim$5 kpc. We find that H i dominates the mass loading. The total H i mass outflow rate (above $z~>2$ kpc) is between $5-13~{\rm M}_{\odot }~\rm yr^{-1}$, accounting for uncertainties from disc-blurring and group interactions. The total ionized mass outflow rate (traced by H$\alpha$) is between 0.5 and $5~{\rm M}_{\odot }~\rm yr^{-1}$, depending on $n_e(z)$ assumptions. From ALMA/ACA observations, we place an upper limit on CO flux in the outflow which correlates to $\lesssim 2.9~{\rm M}_{\odot }~\rm yr^{-1}$. We also show that the entire outflow is not limited to the bicone, but a secondary starburst at the edge generates a more widespread outflow, which should be included in simulations. The cool gas in NGC 4666 wind has insufficient velocity to escape the halo of a galaxy of its mass, especially because most of the mass is present in the slower atomic phase. This strong biconical wind contributes to gas cycling around the galaxy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→