MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415946098 · doi:10.3329/nimcj.v15i1.85396

Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Personnel Regarding Disinfection and Sterilization of Surgical Instruments at a Tertiary Level Hospital in Rajshahi

2025· article· W4415946098 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Tahmidul Islam, Md Jawadul Haque, Gazi Salauddin, Lamia Sarker

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern International Medical College Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMedical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsCanada Energy Regulator
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careSterilization (economics)Healthcare serviceTertiary levelPopulationTertiary careHealth servicesMarital statusPatient care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The process of sterilization involves eliminating or completely destroying all germs, including bacterial spores. Controlling and preventing infections is a crucial component of providing safe patient care. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare personnel regarding disinfection and sterilization of surgical instruments at tertiary level hospitals in Rajshahi. Methodology: This cross-sectional type of descriptive study was conducted over a period of 1 year in the Department of Community Medicine, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi. In this study, study population was healthcare personnel who were working in different tertiary level hospitals in Rajshahi. The knowledge and practice of healthcare personnel regarding disinfection and sterilization of surgical instruments were done by semi-structured questionnaire with score 1 for Yes and 0 for No answer. Health Care Workers (HCWs) score equal to or above 50% were considered having safe knowledge and instrument processing practice (IPP) and score below 50% having unsafe knowledge and IPP on disinfection and sterilization of surgical instruments. The data were analyzed via SPSS (version 24.0) and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: The study population included 236 healthcare workers, of which 142 (60.2%) had safe knowledge and 94 (39.8%) had unsafe knowledge, while, 131 (55.5%) were practicing safely and 105 (44.5%) were practicing unsafely. The majority of healthcare workers with safe knowledge and practice were in the age range of 20-25 years. The relationship between healthcare workers’ knowledge and practice with age, sex, marital status, professional status, working departments and duration of service were not statistically significant ( p > 0.05 each). On the other hand, the relationship between healthcare workers’ infection prevention training, awareness on infection prevention, availability of poster, standard operating procedure (SOP) or guideline and vaccination against hepatitis B were statistically significant ( p < 0.05 each). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated that the way medical staff members clean and store equipment was unsafe. HCWs must be more knowledgeable about infection prevention and control (IPC) and possess superior operational abilities if healthcare facilities are to be free of infections. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol. 15 No. 1-2 July 2023-January 2024, Page 655-659

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthern International Medical College JournalSame topicMedical Device Sterilization and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207