MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415946115 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102203

“With the free bus, you didn't have to worry”: Mental wellbeing impacts of a free intercity transportation service in Canada

2025· article· en· W4415946115 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anu Yadav, Danielle Debruyne, Akram Khayatzadeh‐Mahani, Grace Akinjobi, V. V. Ramana Rao, Z.-u.- Rahman, Cari McIlduff, Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of AlbertaSaskatchewan HealthSaskatchewan Science CentreUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMental healthGovernment (linguistics)Thematic analysisPublic transportIndigenousSocial exclusionPublic healthAbandonment (legal)Service (business)Poison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public transportation is a key social determinant of health, and its absence can reduce mobility and erode social connections—placing a disproportionate burden on the mental wellbeing of equity-deserving populations. While the link between transportation and health is recognized, the specific mental health impacts of transportation access remain underexplored. This study addresses that gap by examining the mental health impacts of the first universally free rural intercity transportation initiative in Saskatchewan, Canada. We employed a qualitative case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 43 participants (37 bus riders, 6 operational staff) and six conversation circles involving 18 participants in northern Saskatchewan. Informed by theories of structural violence and Indigenous self-determination, we used NVivo 14 software to conduct a hybrid deductive–inductive thematic analysis to generate themes and subthemes. We identified two sets of themes revealing how the free bus service promoted riders' mental health. The first set of themes reflected mental wellbeing improvements while the service was operational, including enhanced psychological wellbeing, increased autonomy, reduced stress, and strengthened social ties—anchored in a sense of safety and dignity. The second set captured the consequences of the service's abrupt closure: heightened anxiety, increased social isolation, and feelings of abandonment and government neglect steeped in racism. Affordable, accessible transportation is vital to mental wellbeing. Free, reliable public transportation reduces isolation and fosters wellbeing, while its absence—particularly in rural and marginalized communities can exacerbate social exclusion and psychological distress. • Lack of transportation is perceived as a form of racism and structural violence. • Lack of transportation in rural parts of Canada is connected with stress and a sense of alienation. • Free transportation improves mental wellbeing in rural communities. • Free transportation supports autonomy, independence and dignity for vulnerable community members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207