MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415946119 · doi:10.3329/nimcj.v15i1.85398

A Cross-sectional Study on Purpose of Smartphone use among Urban Girls’ School Students

2025· article· W4415946119 on OpenAlexaff
B H Nazma Yasmeen, Md. Tahmidul Islam, Gazi Salauddin, Lamia Sarker, Ishrat Jahan, Rowshan Jahan Akhter

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern International Medical College Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsCanada Energy Regulator
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Nonprobability samplingSmartphone applicationSample (material)Data collectionFamily incomeAndroid (operating system)Descriptive statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Smartphones have become an integral part of students’ daily lives, particularly among secondary school students. With easy access to the internet, social media, and various applications, smartphones offer powerful tools for communication, learning, and entertainment. Excessive smartphone use among school children therefore raises concern about academic performances, sleep pattern and mental health. As a result the balance between educational benefits and negative impacts of smartphone use has become an area of concern to study. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 6th to 20th March 2023. An urban girls’ school was selected and data were collected from the students of class VIII, class IX and class X using purposive sampling technique. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data and the final sample size was 275. The data were analyzed via SPSS (version 25.0). Results: The mean ± SD (Standard Deviation) age of the girls was 14.55±0.99 years. The majority of the students were in class VIII (49.8%) and Muslim (87.2%). More than one-fourth of the students’ fathers were graduates (26.6%) and mothers were educated up to SSC (27.6%). The majority of the students’ fathers were involved in business (33.8%) and mothers were housewives (85.5%). More than four-fifths (85.5%) of the students represented nuclear families and two-fifths (43.3%) had a monthly family income of below Tk. 30,000. The majority (44%) first started using a smartphone from class V or VI. Nearly half of them (42.1%) used their mothers’ phone. Majority used android phones (78.2%), anytime (51.6%) during holidays, after school (86.9%), 1 to 2 hours (41.5%) a day. Only one-tenth of the students (10.5%) usually brought their smartphones to school depending on the situation. The majority of the students used smartphones for knowledge and education (77.5%), social media (54.2%), communication with friends and relatives (52%) purposes and frequently used YouTube (74.2%), WhatsApp (65.8%) and Instagram (35.6%) as social media sites. Conclusion: Mobile phone has a significant influence on the young generation which leads to create a networked society. This study was conducted in order to better interpret the usage pattern of mobile phone among secondary school students. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol. 15 No. 1-2 July 2023-January 2024, Page 667-671

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthern International Medical College JournalSame topicImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFrench-language works237,207