La recuperación de la capa de ozono: ¿Un obstáculo en la educación para el cambio climático?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Enmienda de Kigali ha introducido nuevos compuestos bajo la supervisión del Protocolo de Montreal que, si bien no contribuyen a la destrucción del ozono estratosférico, presentan un alto potencial de calentamiento global. La monitorización de estos compuestos bajo los auspicios del mismo protocolo podría fortalecer concepciones alternativas, dado que la sociedad asume la existencia de relaciones causales entre la degradación de la capa de ozono y el cambio climático. Por tanto, este estudio exploratorio pretende evaluar si la difusión de noticias positivas sobre la recuperación de la capa de ozono reduce la severidad y urgencia en la percepción de la lucha contra el cambio climático en estudiantes de secundaria, así como si refuerza las ideas preexistentes de causalidad entre ambos fenómenos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".