MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415961397 · doi:10.1121/10.0039767

Stable adaptive training for physics-informed neural networks in acoustic wave propagation

2025· article· en· W4415961397 on OpenAlexaff
Márcio Henrique Marques Macedo, Letícia Prudêncio Mendonça, Arthur Bizzi, Leonardo Gomes Moreira, Cristiane Limeira De Oliveira, Daniela Portela de Oliveira, Lucas dos Santos Fernandez, Vitor Balestro, João M. Pereira, Daniel Yukimura, Tiago Novello, Pavel S. Petrov, Lucas Nissenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueJASA Express Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersPetrobras
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Artificial neural networkStability (learning theory)UnderwaterEnergy (signal processing)Boundary (topology)Training (meteorology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Time domain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising tool for simulating various phenomena. However, their application in underwater acoustics remains challenging, primarily due to the need to sample large computational domains and to convergence to trivial solutions. This study presents a strategy to address these issues by combining adaptive domain sampling with absorbing boundary conditions. The adaptive sampler dynamically focuses computational effort on regions where the acoustic energy is localized, while the absorbing boundaries perform training stabilization. Numerical experiments show that our method improves the stability and convergence of PINN training, leading to more accurate and reliable wave propagation simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJASA Express LettersSame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207