MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mifepristone Access Through Community Pharmacies When Regulated as a Routine Prescription Medication

2025· article· en· W4415966129 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth Nethery, C. Shan Xu, Carissa Chan, Mary Helmer‐Smith, Andrea Stucchi, Dawn Mooney, Enav Z. Zusman, Sheila Dunn, Robert Pammett, Wendy V. Norman, Giuliana Guarna, Michael R. Law, Laura Schummers

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcMaster UniversityWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMifepristoneReferralMedical prescriptionPharmacyPharmacistService (business)Abortion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: The mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion regimen became available in Canada as a normally prescribed medication, without restrictions, in 2017. Despite rapid uptake, patients have reported difficulty accessing this time-sensitive medication. Objective: To quantify mifepristone availability within 3 calendar days at community pharmacies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, cross-sectional study using a mystery caller survey was conducted from July to August 2024 at community pharmacies in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Exposure: Surveyor posing as a patient with a prescription for mifepristone who requests to pick up the medication within 3 calendar days. For nondispensing pharmacies (ie, unable to dispense within 3 days), surveyors requested a referral to a dispensing pharmacy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of pharmacies that could dispense mifepristone or provide a valid referral to a dispensing pharmacy; proportion of reproductive-aged (15-49 years) female population residing within 15-minute walking and 15-, 30-, and 60-minute driving times of a dispensing pharmacy, and proportion of the population with poor local availability (<50% of available pharmacies dispense mifepristone). Results: Among 1460 of 1482 community pharmacies, 962 (66%) could dispense mifepristone within 3 days and 169 (12%) provided a valid referral. Only one-third of nondispensing pharmacies (169 of 498 pharmacies [34%]) provided a valid referral to a dispensing pharmacy; 329 pharmacies (23%) neither dispensed within 3 days nor provided a valid referral. Almost all reproductive-aged females (1 095 915 of 1 110 218 females [99%]) in BC lived within a 15-minute drive of a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy. Urban pharmacies were more likely to be nondispensing and nonreferring (relative risk [RR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80) and less likely to offer same-day dispensing (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51) compared with rural pharmacies. Populations in areas with the most residential instability (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.67) or greater ethnocultural diversity (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.61) had poorer local availability of mifepristone-dispensing pharmacies. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found 99% of reproductive-aged BC females lived within a 15-minute drive of a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy; however, despite relatively good geographic coverage and mifepristone being available as a routine prescription, 23% of pharmacies neither dispensed within 3 days nor provided a valid referral, putting the onus on patients to identify a dispensing pharmacy. These findings may inform policy and initiatives to enhance pharmacist referral networks and improve mifepristone access, as well as service planning for international jurisdictions considering a similar medication abortion framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207