MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Conceptual Principles of Identifying the Tax Object for Income Tax in the Context of Digital Transformation

2025· article· uk· W4415967194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOblik i finansi · 2025
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDigital Transformation in Financial Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject (grammar)International taxationTransparency (behavior)Context (archaeology)InefficiencyTax deductionTax reform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain, and cloud platforms increases the accuracy and efficiency of accounting data processing, and therefore the transparency of financial reporting indicators. At the same time, the inefficiency of traditional methods in the conditions of digitalization of management increases the risks of distortion of tax information, reduces the level of control, and causes fiscal losses, which is a serious challenge for the tax administration system. The article aims to develop a holistic concept of forming the tax object for corporate income tax, integrated into the digital environment and adapted to modern economic development challenges. The research methodology combines such methods and techniques as content analysis, a systematic approach, analysis and synthesis, comparison, grouping and classification, detailing and aggregation of financial and tax reporting indicators, construction of diagrams and drawings, and modeling. An integrated model and architecture of the digital concept of forming the object of taxation has been built, which allows for the identification of the effectiveness of various approaches in a virtual environment. To substantiate the practical feasibility of the proposed solutions, elements of expert assessment were used, implemented by generalizing the experience of the European Union, Great Britain, Australia, and Canada. The article presents an innovative concept of integrated income tax administration, which combines key accounting principles with algorithms for automated calculation of tax liabilities. The proposed model allows for the reduction of discrepancies between financial and tax indicators, increases the accuracy of reporting, optimizes tax administration procedures, ensures transparent interaction between state bodies and enterprises, and creates conditions for strategic planning of tax payments. The study results form a holistic approach to determining the object of taxation and administering tax liabilities, which agricultural and industrial enterprises can effectively apply when using digital accounting systems and ERP solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it