Exploring sound installation reactivity: Acoustic niches in public space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the soundscape approach gains increased research attention, it remains underexplored in urban design and sound art.Sound installations in public spaces exist within dynamic acoustic environments, where the interplay between pre-existing sounds and introduced artistic elements influences the auditory experience in complex ways.Yet, there is a lack of tools and methods to evaluate their perceptual impact and inform artistic practice.The present work is part of a research-creation collaboration on Niches Acoustiques, a permanent sound installation designed by sound artist Nadine Schtz for a public square in Paris.The installation explores the acoustic niche hypothesis by adapting its sonic content in reaction to fluctuations in the acoustic environment.We report on a laboratory study focusing on the installation's reactivity, following up an initial study that linked composition strategies to soundscape perception.Specifically, we present the implementation of variations in the installation's responsivenesssuch as amplifying, attenuating, or transforming its content -in reaction to the ambient conditions.These variations serve as a framework for evaluating the impact of reactivity across different listening scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".