MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415968291 · doi:10.3390/smartcities8060187

Multi-Sensor AI-Based Urban Tree Crown Segmentation from High-Resolution Satellite Imagery for Smart Environmental Monitoring

2025· article· en· W4415968291 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Sharifi, Reza Shah–Hosseini, Danesh Shokri, Saeid Homayouni

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Cities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationSatellite imageryTree (set theory)Feature (linguistics)Deep learningImage segmentationSatelliteResidualWatershed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban tree detection is fundamental to effective forestry management, biodiversity preservation, and environmental monitoring—key components of sustainable smart city development. This study introduces a deep learning framework for urban tree crown segmentation that exclusively leverages high-resolution satellite imagery from GeoEye-1, WorldView-2, and WorldView-3, thereby eliminating the need for additional data sources such as LiDAR or UAV imagery. The proposed framework employs a Residual U-Net architecture augmented with Attention Gates (AGs) to address major challenges, including class imbalance, overlapping crowns, and spectral interference from complex urban structures, using a custom composite loss function. The main contribution of this work is to integrate data from three distinct satellite sensors with varying spatial and spectral characteristics into a single processing pipeline, demonstrating that such well-established architectures can yield reliable, high-accuracy results across heterogeneous resolutions and imaging conditions. A further advancement of this study is the development of a hybrid ground-truth generation strategy that integrates NDVI-based watershed segmentation, manual annotation, and the Segment Anything Model (SAM), thereby reducing annotation effort while enhancing mask fidelity. In addition, by training on 4-band RGBN imagery from multiple satellite sensors, the model exhibits generalization capabilities across diverse urban environments. Despite being trained on a relatively small dataset comprising only 1200 image patches, the framework achieves state-of-the-art performance (F1-score: 0.9121; IoU: 0.8384; precision: 0.9321; recall: 0.8930). These results stem from the integration of the Residual U-Net with Attention Gates, which enhance feature representation and suppress noise from urban backgrounds, as well as from hybrid ground-truth generation and the combined BCE–Dice loss function, which effectively mitigates class imbalance. Collectively, these design choices enable robust model generalization and clear performance superiority over baseline networks such as DeepLab v3 and U-Net with VGG19. Fully automated and computationally efficient, the proposed approach delivers cost-effective, accurate segmentation using satellite data alone, rendering it particularly suitable for scalable, operational smart city applications and environmental monitoring initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart CitiesSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207