MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Self-Attention Transformer Based Short-Term Load Prediction for Electrical Distribution Feeders

2025· article· W4415968980 on OpenAlexaff
Xingjian Jiang, Shichao Liu, Chunsheng Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerArtificial neural networkDependency (UML)Electric power systemElectrical loadNonlinear systemDemand forecastingElectricityPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the acceleration of urbanization, climate change, and population growth, the global electricity demand shows a significant upward trend. Accurate short-term load forecasting (STLF) plays a vital role in optimizing the operation of the electrical distribution system. Although recent deep learning-based short-term load forecasting models have shown significant advantages, achieving accurate load forecasting remains a daunting challenge as power load demand is affected by many external environmental factors and the inherent defects of traditional forecasting models such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and support vector machine (SVM). In order to tackle this challenge, this paper proposes a transformer-based short-term load forecasting model. It takes loads in distributed feeders as forecasting objects and makes full use of the self-attention mechanism to capture the long-term dependency and complex nonlinear characteristics of load data. Experimental results show that the model performs well in processing complex time-series data and load fluctuations in different seasons. It has strong generalization ability and provides a new solution for forecasting distribution feeder load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207