MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model Predictive Control of a Three-Phase Seven-Level Nested Switched-Capacitor Converter with Flying Capacitor Voltage Balancing

2025· article· W4415970034 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Ebrahimi, Alireza Bakhshai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorRobustness (evolution)RippleControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlVoltageInverter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a three-phase seven-level nested switched-capacitor (7L-NSC) inverter that incorporates two symmetrical flying capacitors per phase, each rated at one-third of the DC-link voltage. To ensure reliable operation across all conditions, a finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) strategy is employed. This control approach leverages redundant switching states to maintain accurate current tracking and ensure effective voltage balancing of the flying capacitors. A detailed mathematical analysis of the inverter, including capacitor voltage ripple behavior under both steady-state and transient conditions, confirms the robustness of the proposed control method. The performance of the control strategy is validated through comprehensive simulation studies in PSIM and verified by experimental testing using a laboratory-built prototype. Results from both simulations and hardware experiments demonstrate the method’s capability to maintain low THD and stable capacitor voltages, confirming its suitability for advanced multilevel inverter applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207