MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415974290 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5717.4.2

A review of geographic variation in the monocled cobra, Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831 (Serpentes: Elapidae) with the designation of a neotype

2025· review· W4415974290 on OpenAlexaff
Neil R. Balchan, Damien Esquerré, Guinevere O. U. Wogan, Wolfgang Wüster

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2025
Typereview
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity College of the North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityParapatric speciationButhidaeTaxonSubgenusGeographic variationTaxonomy (biology)Phylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831) is a medically important elapid snake with substantial geographic variation across South and Southeast Asia. Throughout its broad distribution, spanning various major ecoregions and habitat types, N. kaouthia displays a great amount of phenotypic variation. Recent taxonomic developments in the Asiatic cobras (Naja, subgenus Naja), namely the description of a new species (Naja fuxi Shi et al. 2022), have resulted in confusion regarding the affinities of non-spitting cobras across Indochina. Due to close morphological resemblances and poorly resolved phylogenetic relationships among three sympatric and/or parapatric taxa (N. atra, N. fuxi, and N. kaouthia), additional research is needed to disentangle species limits, evolutionary history, ecology, and distribution of these species from one another. A long history of taxonomic confusion and ambiguity in this group, combined with the suggestion of additional cryptic and unrecognized diversity, underscores a need for continued study of the Asiatic cobras. Consequently, we summarize information on N. kaouthia, compiling data on geographic distribution, phylogenetic relationships, phenotypic variation, venom variation, and venom spitting behavior. While distribution-wide trends do appear to be present for some characteristics (i.e., regional trends in venom spitting behavior, body coloring and patterns), they are apparently lacking or poorly defined for others (i.e., trends in venom composition). In view of future study on N. kaouthia, and accounting for the missing holotype, we designate a neotype for the species, thereby restricting the type locality to 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, within the original ambiguous type locality of “Bengale, Inde”. Future taxonomic treatments resulting in the recognition of additional diversity within N. kaouthia will thus require that the name be maintained for snakes from the newly restricted type locality. We encourage detailed investigation on the Asiatic cobras using integrative lines of evidence combining mitochondrial, nuclear, and morphological datasets, but emphasize that nomenclatural decisions should only be made with a large body of supporting evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicVenomous Animal Envenomation and StudiesFrench-language works237,207