A review of geographic variation in the monocled cobra, Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831 (Serpentes: Elapidae) with the designation of a neotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831) is a medically important elapid snake with substantial geographic variation across South and Southeast Asia. Throughout its broad distribution, spanning various major ecoregions and habitat types, N. kaouthia displays a great amount of phenotypic variation. Recent taxonomic developments in the Asiatic cobras (Naja, subgenus Naja), namely the description of a new species (Naja fuxi Shi et al. 2022), have resulted in confusion regarding the affinities of non-spitting cobras across Indochina. Due to close morphological resemblances and poorly resolved phylogenetic relationships among three sympatric and/or parapatric taxa (N. atra, N. fuxi, and N. kaouthia), additional research is needed to disentangle species limits, evolutionary history, ecology, and distribution of these species from one another. A long history of taxonomic confusion and ambiguity in this group, combined with the suggestion of additional cryptic and unrecognized diversity, underscores a need for continued study of the Asiatic cobras. Consequently, we summarize information on N. kaouthia, compiling data on geographic distribution, phylogenetic relationships, phenotypic variation, venom variation, and venom spitting behavior. While distribution-wide trends do appear to be present for some characteristics (i.e., regional trends in venom spitting behavior, body coloring and patterns), they are apparently lacking or poorly defined for others (i.e., trends in venom composition). In view of future study on N. kaouthia, and accounting for the missing holotype, we designate a neotype for the species, thereby restricting the type locality to 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, within the original ambiguous type locality of “Bengale, Inde”. Future taxonomic treatments resulting in the recognition of additional diversity within N. kaouthia will thus require that the name be maintained for snakes from the newly restricted type locality. We encourage detailed investigation on the Asiatic cobras using integrative lines of evidence combining mitochondrial, nuclear, and morphological datasets, but emphasize that nomenclatural decisions should only be made with a large body of supporting evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".