MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415974330 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.037

Proof and Application of Little’s Formula in Optimizing Bulk-service Multi-server Queue Systems

2025· article· en· W4415974330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersCanadian Defence Academy
KeywordsQueueQueueing theoryBulk queueFunction (biology)Queueing systemServerService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents closed-form expressions for the steady-state mean queue length in a complex bulk-service, multi-server queueing system denoted as GI/M a,b /c. In this continuous system, customers arrive according to an arbitrary distribution, and ′′ c ′′ servers operate independently, each serving a group of customers with a size between ′′ a ′′ and ′′ b ′′ . We demonstrate the applicability of Little’s formula to this queueing system, establishing a foundational relationship between the average queue length and the average time customers spend in the system. Our findings provide valuable insights into the system’s performance, and essential for assessing efficiency and optimizing service strategies. Additionally, We formulate an objective function and compute the optimal values of the decision variables (a, b) that maximize the expected profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it