MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415976775 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.05.686746

Network-Based Analysis of Human Astrocytes Links Aging to Neurodegenerative and Cardiovascular Diseases

2025· preprint· W4415976775 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Mirela Bota, Pol Picón-Pagès, Hugo Fanlo-Ucar, Saja Almabhouh, Oriol Bagudanch, Melisa Ece Zeylan, Simge Senyuz, Patrick Gohl, Rubén Molina-Fernández, Narcís Fernández‐Fuentes, Eduard Barbu, Raúl Vicente, Stanley Nattel, Ángel Ois, Albert Puig‐Pijoan, Jordi García‐Ojalvo, Özlem Keskin, Attila Gürsoy, Francisco J. Muñoz, Baldomero Oliva

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersAgencia Estatal de Investigación
KeywordsProteostasisNeurodegenerationTranscriptomeAstrocyteGeneOxidative stressDiseaseLaminCell typeDNA damage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Astrocytes are central to brain homeostasis, supporting neuronal metabolism, synaptic activity, and the blood–brain barrier. With aging, these glial cells undergo molecular and functional changes that weaken support functions and promote neuroinflammation, contributing to neurodegeneration. Yet the systems-level mechanisms of astrocytic aging remain poorly defined in human models. Because aging also heightens risk for cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, type 2 diabetes, and systemic inflammation, clarifying shared astrocytic pathways is critical for understanding brain–body crosstalk. Using an in vitro human astrocyte model exposed to sublethal oxidative stress (10 µM H₂O₂), we profiled transcriptomic changes and identified differentially expressed genes across antioxidant defences, proteostasis, transcriptional regulation, vesicular trafficking, and inflammatory signalling. We then performed seven network-prioritization analyses on a curated human protein–protein interactome: one seeded with the astrocyte H₂O₂-responsive genes and six with phenotype-associated gene sets (Alzheimer’s disease, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, type 2 diabetes, oxidative stress, and inflammation). Intersecting the top 5% scoring genes from each run yielded a 127-gene core shared across all seven, enriched for proteostasis, DNA repair, mitochondrial regulation, and telomere and nuclear envelope maintenance. Structure-guided analyses highlighted vulnerable interfaces, including lamin A/C–lamin B1, α-actinin–filamins, 14-3-3 dimers, and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase assemblies, where pathogenic variants are predicted to destabilize or aberrantly stabilize protein interactions. Structure-based interface predictions also highlight potential interactions between APP–VCP/p97 and p53–14-3-3ζ that link proteostasis and stress signalling. Together, these findings define a conserved astrocytic vulnerability network that may couple neurodegeneration with cardiovascular disease and nominate structurally testable targets for biomarkers and interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207