MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415980467 · doi:10.30965/18763324-bja10133

The Religious Legacy of Pope John Paul II during the Transition from the Communist Era

2025· article· W4415980467 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anastasia Kulaga

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Soviet and Post-Soviet Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyReligiosityCommunismNewspaperPoliticsConsciousnessReligious freedomChristianityIdentity (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the 1990s, countries in Eastern Europe, like Poland, could no longer sustain the instability of Soviet rule and were eager to gain independence. The collapse of Soviet domination in Poland after 1989 allowed the country to democratize politically and restore religious freedom. Pope John Paul II used this moment to reignite religion within Poland’s socio-cultural fabric, reminding the nation of its deep-rooted Catholic traditions. By integrating religiosity into Poland’s major political movement, Solidarność , Pope John Paul II succeeded at fostering a stronger religious consciousness among the Polish people. By researching the archived Polish Catholic Church newsletter, St. Ladislaus News and Canadian-Polish language weekly newspaper Czas , several key themes emerged pointing to the multifaceted influence of Pope John Paul II . This research highlights the role of Pope John Paul II ’s papacy in strengthening Polish national identity through religion, providing Poles with democratic freedom as they gained independence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Soviet and Post-Soviet ReviewSame topicReligion and Society InteractionsFrench-language works237,207