MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415981870 · doi:10.7759/cureus.96261

A Case of Postpartum Preeclampsia With an Unusual Presentation

2025· article· en· W4415981870 on OpenAlexaff
Akiva Eleff, Mendel Shloush, Brian Bugay

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreeclampsiaPregnancyBradycardiaBlood pressurePresentation (obstetrics)Pulmonary embolismPostpartum period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that usually presents with elevated blood pressure. It may also occur in the postpartum period with atypical features, which can complicate timely recognition and adequate treatment. We report a case of a 33-year-old female patient who presented five days postpartum with chest tightness and shortness of breath. Initial findings were atypical for preeclampsia. She was severely bradycardic and normotensive, though hypoxic and tachypneic. Workup excluded postpartum cardiomyopathy and pulmonary embolism (PE), but revealed small bilateral pleural effusions. Within three hours, her blood pressure rose to 160/90 mmHg. Given the rapid onset of severe hypertension combined with laboratory evidence of multisystem organ involvement, including mildly elevated liver enzymes, proteinuria, and pleural effusions, she was diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features. Management included oxygen and antihypertensive therapy with hydralazine. She was safely discharged two days later. This case is notable because the patient presented with bradycardia and normotension, which are uncommon findings in preeclampsia. The subsequent rise in blood pressure, combined with pleural effusions, supported the diagnosis once other cardiopulmonary causes were excluded. Careful evaluation, timely treatment, and appropriate monitoring led to a favorable outcome. This highlights the importance of considering preeclampsia in postpartum patients with atypical presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→