MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415981885 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02990

A Resource-Driven Approach for Implementing CNNs on FPGAs Using Adaptive IPs

2025· preprint· en· W4415981885 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Magalhães, Virginie Fresse, Benoît Suffran, Olivier Alata

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayConvolutional neural networkFlexibility (engineering)Digital signal processingPoolingConvolution (computer science)Application-specific integrated circuitKernel (algebra)Resource (disambiguation)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for real-time, low-latency artificial intelligence applications has propelled the use of Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) implementations. FPGAs offer reconfigurability, energy efficiency, and performance advantages over GPUs, making them suitable for edge devices and embedded systems. This work presents a novel library of resource-efficient convolution IPs designed to automatically adapt to the available FPGA resources. Developed in VHDL, these IPs are parameterizable and utilize fixed-point arithmetic for optimal performance. Four IPs are introduced, each tailored to specific resource constraints, offering flexibility in DSP usage, logic consumption, and precision. Experimental results on a Zynq UltraScale+ FPGA highlight the trade-offs between performance and resource usage. The comparison with recent FPGA-based CNN acceleration techniques emphasizes the versatility and independence of this approach from specific FPGA architectures or technological advancements. Future work will expand the library to include pooling and activation functions, enabling broader applicability and integration into CNN frameworks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207