MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Spring awakening? Seasonal controls on halomethoxybenzenes in arctic waters

2025· article· en· W4415983328 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Danielle Haas Freeman, E.D. Shipley, Penny Vlahos, Mats Tysklind, Terry F. Bidleman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConnecticut Sea Grant, University of ConnecticutEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaNational Science FoundationVetenskapsrådetSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasSkogs- och Jordbrukets ForskningsrådUmeå Universitet
KeywordsSeawaterSpring (device)ArcticAtmosphere (unit)FjordSea iceDeposition (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halomethoxybenzenes (HMBs), including 2,4-dibromoanisole (DBA), 2,4,6-tribromoanisole (TBA), and drosophilin A methyl ether (1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-3,6-dimethoxybenzene; DAME) are bioaccumulative halogenated compounds with natural and anthropogenic sources. This study characterized these three HMBs in seawater and DAME in air in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. The goal was to describe and explain distributions of HMBs as seasonal ice retreated in spring. The results show that concentrations of individual HMBs are sensitive to distinct environmental processes. DBA decreased during spring blooms, while spring freshwater brought DAME into the system. Net volatilization of DAME occurred at a freshwater-influenced site, while all other site samples demonstrated net deposition of DAME from the atmosphere to seawater or equilibrium with respect to gas exchange. The highest concentrations of TBA occurred near freshwater, but there were no statistically significant trends in the levels of this compound. Arctic sampling did not show evidence of a buildup of HMBs under ice from possible production by ice algae or bacteria. The different trends in concentrations of individual HMBs and their sensitivity to environmental variables over a short timescale complicates comparisons across systems, evaluations of ecological function, and potential risk assessments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact→French-language works237,207→