Possessive Phrases in Old Anatolian Turkish Texts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, I offer an analysis to explain semantic and syntactic features of Old Anatolian Turkish possessive phrases based on a comparative approach with Standard Turkish. There are three types of possessive phrases in Standard Turkish, the first type of which expresses specificity and definiteness: "çocuğun kalemi", "çocuk kalemi", "çocuğun kalem". In Old Anatolian Turkish, while the first two types of possessive phrases above are frequently encountered, the third type, e.g."çocuğun kalem" is unavailable. What is more, the second type, e.g. “çocuk kalemi” can also express definiteness and specificity, which means that there is another type of standard possessive phrases, in addition to genitive-possessive construction. These two standard possessive phrases of the period can be used instead of each other. But there are some semantic and syntactic constraints between the above-mentioned two variants of standard possessive phrases in addition to the common features they share.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it