MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415988848 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-5330

Sea ice melt drives vertical pCO <sub>2</sub> variability modulating air-sea gas exchange

2025· article· W4415988848 on OpenAlexaff
Henry C. Henson, Dorte Haubjerg Søgaard, Bjarne Jensen, Kunuk Lennert, Tim Papakyriakou, Mikael K. Sejr, J. Sievers, Søren Rysgaard, Lise Lotte Sørensen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammePinngortitaleriffikAarhus Universitets ForskningsfondAage V. Jensens FondeDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAarhus UniversitetEuropean CommissionHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilEnergi-, Forsynings- og KlimaministerietNational Research FoundationDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumVillum Fonden
KeywordsFjordArcticFlux (metallurgy)Sea iceHomogeneousArctic ice packArctic geoengineeringCarbonateAtmosphere (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Strong spatial and temporal gradients in salinity, temperature, and carbonate chemistry in Arctic coastal surface waters complicate the estimation of air-sea CO2 exchange, particularly during sea ice breakup. This study evaluates the applicability of the widely used bulk flux model under such conditions. The bulk approach assumes homogeneous surface conditions and linear vertical pCO2 gradients. However, our observations in a stratified Arctic fjord reveal pronounced vertical variability in pCO2 within the upper water column, including non-linear gradients near the air-sea interface. Micrometeorological measurements captured episodic upward CO2 fluxes even when waters 1 m and below were CO2-undersaturated. We hypothesize that transient, high-pCO2 layers at ~0.1 m depth intermittently decouple the atmospheric exchange from subsurface waters, reversing the expected flux direction. These findings highlight the importance of resolving near-surface variability during the transition from ice-covered to open water conditions. We recommend incorporating micrometeorological techniques and high-resolution vertical profiling in Arctic fjords to improve flux estimates of CO2 in this rapidly changing region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→