MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Laser Probe Techniques with Adaptive FPGA Device

2025· article· W4415990578 on OpenAlex
Zhi Hao Ko, Amitesh Kumar, Jobin Thomas Valliyakalayil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arraySIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingImplementationArtificial neural networkDual (grammatical number)LaserQuality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper introduces an accessible implementation of laser probe (LP) techniques using a single adaptive field-programmable gate array (FPGA) device. Through several case studies, we demonstrate different integration methods and improvements over conventional ways. First, we investigate two alternative implementations of frequency-domain mapping (FM): one using a software-defined lock-in amplifier, and another using a dual boxcar averager module. Second, we explore a time-domain mapping (TM) technique implemented with the dual boxcar averager. Third, we introduce a customized solution to enhance signal quality in combination with a software-defined lock-in amplifier. Lastly, we examine the use of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically neural networks (NN), to improve LP signal acquisition during real-time signal processing. These approaches reduce barriers to innovation by eliminating the need for substantial upfront legal or financial commitments between collaborating organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it