TCEPVDB: Artificial Intelligence-Based Proteome-Wide Screening of Antigens and Linear T-Cell Epitopes in the Poxviruses and the Development of a Repository
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poxviruses constitute a family of large dsDNA viruses that can infect a plethora of species including humans. Historically, poxviruses have caused a health burden in multiple outbreaks. The large genome of poxviruses favors reverse vaccinology approaches that can determine potential antigens and epitopes. Here, we propose the modeling of a user-friendly database containing the predicted antigens and epitopes of a large cohort of poxvirus proteomes using the existing PoxiPred method for reverse vaccinology of poxviruses. METHODS: In the present study, we obtained the whole proteomes of as many as 37 distinct poxviruses. We utilized each proteome to predict both antigenic proteins and T-cell epitopes of poxviruses with the aid of an Artificial Intelligence method, namely the PoxiPred method. RESULTS: In total, we predicted 3966 proteins as potential antigen targets. Of note, we considered that this protein may exist in a set of proteoforms. Subsets of these proteins constituted a comprehensive repository of 54,291 linear T-cell epitopes. We combined the outcome of the predictions in the format of a web tool that delivers a database of antigens and epitopes of poxviruses. We also developed a comprehensive repository dedicated to providing access to end-users to obtain AI-based screened antigens and T-cell epitopes of poxviruses in a user-friendly manner. These antigens and epitopes can be utilized to design experiments for the development of effective vaccines against a plethora of poxviruses. CONCLUSIONS: The TCEPVDB repository, already deployed to the web under an open-source coding philosophy, is free to use, does not require any login, does not store any information from its users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".