Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is often framed in terms of financial-driven measures, thus missing the deeper spirituality-based dimensions that motivate some individuals when it comes to creating and growing businesses. However, spirituality is more grounded in the individual dimension, which is often overlooked in entrepreneurship studies. Given that women entrepreneurs often view their businesses as a pathway for personal fulfilment for expressing their spiritual beliefs, the Jungian perspective adopted aims to understand the underlying individual (conscious and unconscious) psychological dynamics behind entrepreneurship, offering an in-depth understanding of the spiritual motivation that drives many women through entrepreneurial journey. We build a conceptual model using the Jungian concepts to explain how individual psychological dynamics shape women’s entrepreneurial journey and how spirituality influences women's entrepreneurship. Through this lens, entrepreneurship becomes not just a financial-driven activity but a path to social impact, where the internal motivations tied to spirituality can foster a more community-oriented approach in business. This perspective broadens the understanding of women’s entrepreneurship by highlighting the role of spirituality in driving meaningful, socially conscious enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".