MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

From Digital to AI Transformation? Evolution or Illusion and What it Means for Management

2025· article· en· W4416000660 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Weck, Nicolai Etienne Fabian, Yannik Gehrke, Abayomi Baiyere, David Bendig, Kenneth Guang-Lih Huang, Sebastian Krakowski, Sascha Kraus, Mareike Möhlmann, Emmanuelle Vaast, Henk Volberda

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in Service Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital transformationCloud computingThe InternetGenerative grammarIllusionIndustrial RevolutionObstacleApplications of artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technological transformation has consistently reshaped the business environment, evolving from industrial revolutions to today's wave of digital innovations such as social media, mobile technology, cloud computing, analytics, and the Internet of Things (SMACIT). In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) stands as the forefront of this evolution, driven by the development of advanced tools like generative AI and large language models (e.g., ChatGPT). This symposium examines whether AI represents a significant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicAI in Service InteractionsFrench-language works237,207