Complexity in Nurse Workforce Planning Calling for Adaptive Staffing Strategies in Healthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent scholarship has called for a paradigm shift, advocating for a reallocation of health workers and the implementation of demand-driven and need-based workforce planning strategies to overcome the global nursing shortage in addition to efforts increasing the supply side of the workforce. These approaches aim to align workforce supply more effectively with system demands, mitigating gaps in service delivery across diverse healthcare settings. At the organizational level, flexible and adaptive staffing models are gaining traction as solutions to volatile workforce demands facilitated by online labor platforms. Our symposium offers a multi-faceted perspective on addressing the nursing shortage, providing actionable insights for both systemic and organizational levels of workforce planning. By integrating theoretical insights with empirical evidence, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of adaptive staffing strategies and their potential to transform healthcare workforce management Health Workforce Planning in the Era of Proximity Healthcare: a Systematic Litarature Review Author: Irene GABUTTI; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Author: Lorena Martini; - Author: Daniele Pandolfi; - Author: luigi apuzzo; Author: Domenico Mantoan; - Planning for Flexibility in Home Healthcare: a Qualitative Study Author: Markus Latzke; IMC Krems - University of Applied Sciences Author: Alexander Braun; IMC Krems - University of Applied Sciences Author: Jette Lange; IMC Krems - University of Applied Sciences Author: Anja Kepplinger; IMC Krems - University of Applied Sciences Author: Petra Eggenhofer-Rehart; IMC Krems - University of Applied Sciences Continuity and Flexibility: Unraveling the Impact of Temporary Nurse Staffing on Care Outcomes Author: Inge Wolbers; University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Author: Catharina Van Oostveen; Erasmus University Rotterdam Author: Dewi Stalpers; - Author: Greta Cummings; University of Alberta Author: Kaitlyn Tate; University of Alberta Author: Lisette Schoonhoven; - Author: Pieterbas Lalleman; Fontys University of Applied Sciences Impact of Temporary Nursing Staff on Communication Patterns: an Observation Study Author: Sarah Schmelzer; ZHAW School of Management and Law Author: Sina Berger; Zurich University of Applied Sciences Author: Julia Seelandt; - Author: Zeynep Erden; ZHAW School of Management and Law Author: Florian Liberatore; ZHAW School of Management and Law Patterns of Shift Offers and Bookings of Temporary Nurses: Insights from an Online Labor Platform Author: Florian Liberatore; ZHAW School of Management and Law Author: Marcel Dettling; -
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".