MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tourette syndrome research highlights from 2024

2025· article· en· W4416004233 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Hartmann, Per E. Andrén, Cyril Atkinson-Clément, Virginie Czernecki, Cécile Delorme, Simon Morand‐Beaulieu, Nanette Mol Debes, Kirsten Müller‐Vahl, Peristera Paschou, Natalia Szejko, Apostolia Topaloudi, Kevin J. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueF1000Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFP7 HealthFP7 People: Marie-Curie ActionsNational Institute of Mental HealthBiogenMinisterstwo ZdrowiaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science FoundationGW PharmaceuticalsNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungAmerican Brain FoundationNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesTourette Association of AmericaAlexion PharmaceuticalsNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsTourette syndromeOpen peer reviewIconTicsPlant biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p>We summarize research reports from 2024 relevant to Tourette syndrome, which the authors consider the most important or interesting. This working draft aims to submit this content for publication around the beginning of 2025 in the yearly Tourette Syndrome Research Highlights series on F1000Research. The authors welcome article suggestions and thoughtful feedback from readers, who can add a comment by clicking on the rectangular comment box icon to the left of the LOG IN link at the top of this page. For private comments, you can reach us by email (andreas.hartmann@aphp.fr or kevin@wustl.edu).</ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF1000ResearchSame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207