Magnetic Field Mapping Design for the MOLLER Spectrometer Magnets at Jefferson Lab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) has developed a unique spectrometer system to study the weak interaction between electrons. The “Measurement of Lepton-Lepton Electroweak Reaction” (MOLLER) experiment, utilizing JLab's recent 12 GeV electron beam upgrade, is scheduled to operate for three years. Central to the MOLLER experiment are five water-cooled toroidal magnets, each with a unique geometry and seven-fold symmetry, designed to focus the particles. The magnetic field generated by the Spectrometer is needed to separate the incident beam electrons that scatter from target electrons (Moller scattering) from the protons due to elastic e-p scattering within a liquid hydrogen target. This paper details the magnet field measuring technique developed to map all five MOLLER toroidal magnets at multiple locations inside and along the bore. It covers the design, mounting, and operation of the probe, along with the calibration procedure to determine the field and to prepare a field map for GEANT4 analysis. Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges of accurately measuring low magnetic fields
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".