MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416010573 · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100932

MSAI-Path: Predicting Microsatellite Instability From Routine Histology Slides Without Reinventing the Wheel

2025· article· en· W4416010573 on OpenAlexaff
Elias Baumann, L. Schäfer, Frédérique Meeuwsen, Richard Kirsch, Irıs D. Nagtegaal, Martin D. Berger, Heather Dawson, Inti Zlobec

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersUniversity of BernSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMicrosatellite instabilityDigital pathologyBiopsySegmentationLogistic regressionLynch syndromeDeep learningRandom forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important biomarker in colorectal cancer, influencing both patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Current approaches for MSI prediction from hematoxylin and eosin--stained whole-slide images (WSI) rely on end-to-end deep learning ("black-box") models with limited interpretability, often relying on heatmaps for visualization. However, experienced pathologists can intuitively identify MSI through specific histologic features and have developed manual classification systems such as MS-Path for Lynch syndrome screening. We present a novel hybrid approach that combines computational and pathologist expertise to create an explainable and verifiable method for MSI prediction in colorectal cancer, applicable to resection and biopsy WSI. Our proposed method uses nuclei and tissue segmentation models to automatically quantify MSI-associated histologic features outlined in the Bethesda guidelines, including intraepithelial lymphocytes, grade of differentiation, mucinous components, and tertiary lymphoid structures. After validation on annotated data sets, these features are integrated with clinical data and used in logistic regression and random forest models to predict MSI status. We validated our approach using 3256 WSI from 2267 patients across 7 cohorts from 5 centers. The method achieved an area under the curve of up to 0.88 across all resection cohorts, and 0.90 on biopsies, performing on par with published black-box deep learning models. Importantly, the learned variable importances strongly correlated with manual scoring systems and aligned with manual pathologist assessments. We observed significant intrapatient heterogeneity in predicted scores, emphasizing the importance of whole-case analysis. Our approach also shows potential as a screening tool that could exclude 41% of patients from gold-standard MSI testing while maintaining 95% sensitivity. This study demonstrates that classifiers based on clinical and validated histologic information can predict MSI status as effectively as black-box models while providing complete interpretability. Our method offers an alternative pathway for understandable, explainable, and trustworthy biomarker prediction in computational pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern PathologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207