MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416010682 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2025.3620224

A Precisely Predefined-Time Convergent Barrier RNN for Collaborative Position and Orientation Control of Dual-Arm Robots Under Unknown Bounded Noise

2025· article· en· W4416010682 on OpenAlexaff
Boyu Zheng, Chunquan Li, Dingyu Li, Zhijun Zhang, Junzhi Yu, Peter Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersScience and Technology Department of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBounded functionPiecewiseNoise (video)Convergence (economics)Position (finance)RobotOrientation (vector space)Control theory (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel collaborative position and orientation control scheme (CPOCS) for dual-arm robots is proposed, which is capable of controlling the end-effectors' positions with high precision while preserving their orientations unchanged to some practical tasks (e.g., box handling). To solve the proposed CPOCS in real time while considering key factors such as unknown bounded noise and strict time response constraints in practical engineering environments, this article proposes a novel precisely predefined-time convergent barrier recurrent neural network (PCB-RNN) based on a newly developed piecewise barrier evolution formula. Unlike existing RNNs, the proposed PCB-RNN, owing to its piecewise barrier evolution formula, can achieve precisely predefined-time convergence (PPTC) when addressing the proposed CPOCS under unknown bounded noise conditions. Comprehensive theoretical analysis rigorously proves the PPTC ability of the PCB-RNN under both noise-free and unknown bounded noise conditions. Furthermore, extensive simulation and physical experiments on dual-arm robots validate the effectiveness of the proposed CPOCS and demonstrate the advanced PPTC capability of the proposed PCB-RNN under unknown bounded noises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207