MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416011266 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2025.3627935

Multifidelity Space-Mapping-Based Approach for Accelerated Multiphysics Optimization of Microwave Devices

2025· article· W4416011266 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Yang, Zimeng Wang, Haitian Hu, Wei Zhang, Feng Feng, Qi‐Jun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMultiphysicsSpace mappingSurrogate modelConvergence (economics)ElectromagneticsBayesian optimizationTrust regionArtificial neural networkOptimization problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an advanced multifidelity space-mapping-based approach to accelerate the multiphysics optimization of microwave devices. The proposed method develops a novel two-layer space mapping (SM) framework that strategically integrates two complementary mappings. The first-layer mapping bridges high-fidelity multiphysics analysis (multiphysics fine model) with single-physics electromagnetic (EM) analysis (EM fine model), while the second-layer mapping further leverages this EM fine model to a computationally inexpensive EM coarse model constructed on a coarse mesh (EM coarse model). To effectively capture the complex nonlinear relationships between different fidelity models, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are employed to construct both mappings, enabling efficient fidelity transitions and preserving surrogate model accuracy. A trust-region optimization algorithm, tailored for this multifidelity SM framework, is developed to guarantee stability and convergence efficiency during the optimization process. This algorithm updates the optimization step size based on the local credibility of the surrogate model, effectively guiding the design toward a robust convergence with limited high-fidelity data. By utilizing the two-layer neural network mapping and the custom optimization strategy, our method systematically shifts computationally intensive optimization tasks to the lowest-fidelity model. This significantly reduces the reliance on expensive multiphysics simulations. Validation through three diverse design examples, including waveguide filters and a tunable antenna, demonstrates that the proposed method excels in accelerating multiphysics optimization. The framework effectively reduces the reliance on expensive multiphysics simulations and shortens the total optimization time compared to conventional surrogate modeling approaches, providing a powerful tool for the efficient design of complex microwave devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207