Local Collagen Fibril Orientation Guides Mineral Growth Direction and Morphology: Parallelism in Bone, Cartilage, Enthesis Fibrocartilage, Calcifying Tendon, and Dentin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracellular matrix mineralization is a complex process that starts at the atomic scale and cascades upward. The organic matrix forms first, and then mineralization ensues. Using an array of 2D and 3D X-ray and electron microscopy techniques, we have characterized the relationship between the 3D assembly of collagen fibrils (in terms of bundling and long-range coalignment) and mineral, with a specific focus on how the collagen architecture patterns mineralization in various biological tissues, including bone, cartilage, enthesis fibrocartilage, calcifying tendon and dentin─including ectopic calcification events. In the locally oriented type I collagen-rich matrix of lamellar bone, volumetric simulations of mineral growth resulted in an estimated growth rate of 1.67× along the long axis direction of collagen for prolate mineral aggregates (tesselles). A similar prolate shape was seen for the well-aligned collagen of calcifying fibrocartilage, with the collagen direction and preferred mineral growth direction diverging by ∼15°. In woven bone (ordered and disordered type I collagen), mineral growth is more isotropic, and in calcifying cartilage (disordered type II collagen), mineral foci grow in an equiaxed fashion, producing spherical aggregates of mineral. A stratified/layered structure was also found in the mineral foci of periosteal collar calcifying cartilage. In predentin, planar arrays of type I collagen shape the oblate morphology of calcospherites. Regardless of whether mineralization occurs orthotopically or ectopically, a clear parallelism exists in vivo between the local collagen fibril texture and the preferred direction of microscale mineral growth, expansion, and patterning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".