MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416015469 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.05.686452

Earthworm invasion reduces above-belowground biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality

2025· preprint· W4416015469 on OpenAlexaffabout
Olga Ferlian, Nico Eisenhauer, Michael Bonkowski, Marcel Ciobanu, Kenneth Dumack, Lee E. Frelich, Edward A. Johnson, Bernhard Klarner, Benjamin Rosenbaum, Madhav P. Thakur, Lise Thouvenot, Tesfaye Wubet, Malte Jochum

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsEarthwormEcosystemAbiotic componentBiodiversityEcosystem engineerTerrestrial ecosystemLumbricidaeEcosystem services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Global change alters abiotic and biotic conditions across the globe with unprecedented consequences for the functional integrity of affected ecosystems. However, most studies addressing global-change impacts focus on a very limited number of environmental variables, taxa, and ecosystem functions. Evidence is mounting that many belowground ecosystems are subject to an underappreciated aspect of global change: the invasion of earthworms. While we know that earthworm invasion can impact the physical, chemical, and biological properties of invaded ecosystems, it remains poorly understood how these changes are interconnected and how they concurrently affect the overall functioning of an ecosystem. To fill this gap, we collected data on six environmental variables, ten functional groups of microbes, plants, and animals, and 16 ecosystem functions from four forests in the USA and Canada, well-known hotspots of earthworm invasion. We used a multi-step Structural-Equation Modeling approach to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of earthworm invasion on environmental conditions and the ecosystem multidiversity and multifunctionality of invaded forests at different levels of resolution. Our analysis revealed that earthworm invasion reduced total multidiversity (combined microbial, plant, and animal multidiversity). Ecosystem multifunctionality was reduced via a combination of direct and indirect effects, with the latter involving both effects mediated by altered environmental conditions and by total multidiversity. In contrast, when resolving total multidiversity into taxon-specific multidiversity indices for microbes, plants, and animals, the above-mentioned effects of earthworm invasion on multifunctionality via multidiversity disappeared. Invasion effects on single ecosystem functions differed in their mediators but were net negative across the board. Given these differences across the differently-resolved analyses, the results suggest that a whole- ecosystem perspective is paramount to comprehensively understanding the impacts of biological invasions. Combining a multi-step analytical design with multiple biodiversity indices and multiple ecosystem functions assessed at the same time and place, our study represents the most complete assessment of the mechanisms and ecosystem-level consequences of earthworm invasion to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207