MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416015477 · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107181

Trajectory of olfactory cortex degeneration from normal cognition to Alzheimer's disease: Insights from multimodal neuroimaging

2025· article· en· W4416015477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simin Yang, Bo Xie, Dan Liao, Yuejiao Sun, Zhuo Wang, Huimao Zhang, Yang Yu, Chunjie Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurobiology of Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJilin UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaBeijing Medical Award Foundation
KeywordsNeuroimagingCognitionFunctional neuroimagingOlfactory systemDegeneration (medical)Cortex (anatomy)AtrophyOlfaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The olfactory cortex is among the earliest brain regions affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD), with olfactory deficits frequently preceding cognitive decline. This study aimed to characterize the functional and structural degeneration trajectory of the olfactory cortex from normal cognition (NC) to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and eventually to AD using multimodal neuroimaging techniques. A total of 105 participants (28 with NC, 35 with MCI, and 42 with AD) were subjected to olfactory [University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)] and cognitive [e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)] assessments. This was followed by olfactory task–based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; olfactory activation), resting-state fMRI [amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo)], and structural MRI [gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter volume (WMV)] in 12 olfactory-related regions of interest. Group comparisons using one-way analysis of variance/Kruskal–Wallis and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify stage-specific imaging biomarkers and evaluate diagnostic performance. From the NC to MCI and then to AD groups, a consistent pattern of declining olfactory activation values, GMV, and WMV, coupled with increased ALFF and ReHo in olfactory subregions, was observed. Moreover, corresponding decreases in olfactory and cognitive scores were noted. Our multivariate logistic regression models yielded the following classification performance: NC versus MCI [right primary olfactory cortex (POC) olfactory activation, right insula olfactory activation, left POC GMV, left insula ReHo, right amygdala ALFF, and MMSE scores] achieved 90.5 % accuracy; MCI versus AD (left hippocampal GMV, left insula ReHo, and MMSE scores) reached 94.8 % accuracy; and NC versus AD (left hippocampal GMV and UPSIT scores) achieved 92.9 % accuracy. Our findings delineate a spatiotemporal progression of olfactory cortex degeneration, with early POC alterations in MCI evolving into widespread atrophy and functional dysregulation in AD. Multimodal MRI metrics and logistic modeling yield highly accurate stage classification, underscoring their potential as sensitive biomarkers for early AD detection and monitoring. • Integration of olfactory task–based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), resting-state fMRI, and structural MRI systematically traces the trajectory of olfactory cortex degeneration from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment and eventually to Alzheimer's disease (AD). • Multivariate logistic regression models combining clinical and imaging metrics yielded exceptional diagnostic accuracy (90.5 %–94.8 %), demonstrating the clinical potential of olfactory-based biomarkers. • Early degeneration in the primary olfactory cortex offers measurable changes, supporting its role as a sensitive imaging biomarker for the early detection of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurobiology of DiseaseSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207