PriviRec: Confidential and Decentralized Graph Filtering for Recommender Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in recommender systems have shown that relying on graph filters, such as the normalized item-item adjacency matrix and the ideal low-pass filter yields competitive performance and scales better than Graph Convolutional Networks-based solutions. However, these solutions require centralizing user data, which raises concerns over data privacy, security, and the monopolization of user data by a few actors. To address those concerns, we propose PriviRec and PriviRec-k, two complementary recommendation frameworks. In PriviRec, we show that it is possible to decompose widely used filters so that they can be computed in a distributed setting using Secure Aggregation and a distributed version of the Randomized Power Method, without revealing individual users contributions. PriviRec-k extends this approach by having users securely aggregate low-rank projections of their contributions, enabling a tunable balance between communication overhead and recommendation accuracy. We demonstrate theoretically as well as experimentally on Gowalla, Yelp2018, and Amazon-Book that our methods achieve performance comparable to centralized state-of-the-art recommender systems and superior to decentralized ones, while preserving confidentiality and low communication and computational overheads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it