MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416017819 · doi:10.1109/iccd65941.2025.00068

LM-Fix: Lightweight Bit-Flip Detection and Rapid Recovery Framework for Language Models

2025· preprint· W4416017819 on OpenAlex
Ahmad Tahmasivand, Noureldin Zahran, Saba Al-Sayouri, Mohammed E. Fouda, Khaled N. Khasawneh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Overhead (engineering)Security tokenReliability (semiconductor)SpeedupOffset (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bit-flip attacks threaten the reliability and security of Language Models (LMs) by altering internal parameters and compromising output integrity. Recent studies show that flipping only a few bits in model parameters can bypass safety mechanisms and jailbreak the model. Existing detection approaches for DNNs and CNNs are not suitable for LMs, as the massive number of parameters significantly increases timing and memory overhead for software-based methods and chip area overhead for hardware-based methods. In this work, we present LM-Fix, a lightweight LM-driven detection and recovery framework that leverages the model's own capabilities to identify and recover faults. Our method detects bit-flips by generating a single output token from a predefined test vector and auditing the output tensor of a target layer against stored reference data. The same mechanism enables rapid recovery without reloading the entire model. Experiments across various models show that LM-Fix detects more than 94% of single-bit flips and nearly 100% of multi-bit flips, with very low computational overhead <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\approx 1 \%- 7.7 {\%}$</tex> at TVL <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$=200$</tex> across models). Recovery achieves more than <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$100 \times$</tex> speedup compared to full-model reload, which is critical in edge devices. LM-Fix can handle bit-flips affecting any part of the model's computation, including memory, cache, and arithmetic operations. Evaluation against recent LM-specific bit-flip attacks confirms its robustness and practical value for real-world deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it