MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416018643 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.07.687137

The TEAIV model: Extending the standard TEIV model to account for viral budding ramp up

2025· preprint· W4416018643 on OpenAlexafffund
Samaneh Gholami, Chapin S. Korosec, Q.Y. Su, Matthew Betti, Jessica M. Conway, Iain R. Moyles, James Watmough, Jane M. Heffernan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickMount Allison UniversityYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchYork University
KeywordsBuddingEclipseLimitingEpidemic modelMathematical modelExponential growthViral replicationViral loadMinimal model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding how viruses replicate and spread within a host is fundamental to predicting disease progression, timing, and dosage of effective therapeutic and prophylactic interventions. A target-cell limited approach is often used to model within-host viral kinetics to characterize disease infection dynamics. The standard target-cell limited model, the TEIV model, has been instrumental for understanding SARS-CoV-2 within-host viral kinetics, however, its core assumptions of instantaneous viral budding and exponentially distributed cell lifetimes oversimplify fundamental biological processes, potentially limiting predictive power. In this work, we consider a novel model approach, the TEAIV model: an extension to the TEIV model that considers an infected partially-productive cell state that ramps up through n stages to a fully productive state. We fit the TEAIV model to various SARS-CoV-2 viral load datasets, separated by hospitalized (severe infection) and non-hospitalized (mild infection) individual data, consider multiple different ramping functions, and compare to standard TEIV model fits. We further compare TEAIV and TEIV model fits with and without infected cell death incorporated in the eclipse (E) and partially infected (A) compartments and investigate best-fit frameworks up to 10 A states. We find that linear budding ramp-up dynamics minimizes the BIC (with ΔBIC > 2) across all model formulations when the total number of eclipse and budding compartments exceeds three. Furthermore, we find that the inclusion or exclusion of cell death applied to eclipse or ramping compartments does not substantially affect this result. Finally, we analytically consider the most general TEAIV model and discuss future modelling considerations. Our results demonstrate that accounting for non-instantaneous viral budding provides a better fit to SARS-CoV-2 viral load data and establishes a foundation for more mechanistically informed within-host models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207