Collective parameter estimation of related models with an initial stability constraint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Parameterisation of dynamic biochemical network models is a challenging aspect of systems biology. Especially when the parameter space is large and data is semi quantitive but comparable across different experimental conditions. Here, we present a set of command line tools utilising Pycotools (COPASI) that leverages the power of high-performance computing to facilitate parameter estimation of large models with many unknown parameters. In particular, we expand upon the abilities of Pycotools to address two particular issues. Firstly, the difficulty of constraining a model’s parameterisation to assume the system begins in a steady state (prior to a perturbative stimulation). And secondly, parameterising against relative quantitative time series data that have no absolute scale. Our software operates on the SLURM workload manager system and can be applied to any parameter estimation against time series data produced by applying a single perturbation at time zero to an equilibrated system. We validate that our technique can produce a parameterised model of the MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) network based on semi-quantitative time-series data from 2 breast cancer cell lines, stimulated with insulin and amino acids. We also show our model can make reasonable predictions on distinct signaling dynamics in one breast cancer cell line based on the other by adjusting the initial protein quantities only. In conclusion, models should fit both the initial steady state and the dynamics following stimulation, given that stabilising systems prior to stimulation is a common experimental protocol in signaling research. By expanding standard tools, commonly used in the field, we have developed a widely applicable method, which can easily be evaluated and is amenable to wide general use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".