MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416020679 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03704

Long-Lasting and Slowly Varying Transient Dynamics in Discrete-Time Systems

2025· preprint· W4416020679 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anthony M. Pasion, F. M. G. Magpantay

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)ObservableDynamics (music)Steady state (chemistry)State (computer science)Mathematical modelControl theory (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis of mathematical models in ecology and epidemiology often focuses on asymptotic dynamics, such as stable equilibria and periodic orbits. However, many systems exhibit long transient behaviours where certain aspects of the dynamics remain in a slowly evolving state for an extended period before undergoing rapid change. In this work, we analyse long-lasting and slowly varying transient dynamics in discrete-time systems based on extensions of previous theoretical frameworks developed for continuous-time systems. This involves clarifying the conditions under which we say an observable of the system exhibits prolonged transients, and deriving criteria for characterizing these dynamics. Our results show that specific points in the state space, analogous to previously defined transient centres in continuous-time systems, can generate and sustain long transients in discrete-time models. We demonstrate how these properties manifest in predator–prey models and epidemiological systems, particularly when populations or disease prevalence remain low for extended intervals before sudden shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.org→Same topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models→French-language works237,207→