DoggifAI: A transformer based approach for antibody caninisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antibody translation across species offers a compelling strategy to extend the vast and expensive investments in human therapeutic antibodies to veterinary oncology, with applications in both veterinary medicine and comparative oncology. While precise, low-immunogenic treatments are essential for canine cancer care, traditional species conversion methods rely on ad hoc bioinformatics modifications. These methods often implicitly decouple the framework (FR) and complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), ignoring how structural changes in FRs can affect the conformation and function of CDRs. This can compromise binding specificity and require costly high-throughput in vitro screening. To address this, we present DoggifAI, a transformer model that translates non-canine antibody sequences into canine ones by generating species-appropriate framework regions (FRs) based on desired CDRs. This allows the model to better preserve structural compatibility between FRs and CDRs. The model is pretrained in a T5-style text-to-text denoising task on a large multispecies antibody dataset, which allows further finetuning on a much smaller species-specific dataset. DoggifAI generates highly canine-like antibodies and shows promising results in preserving binding specificity. To support further progress in this field, we also release a curated dataset of over 430,000 unique canine antibody chain sequences, significantly expanding the public sequence repertoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".