MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416026126 · doi:10.1111/sjos.70033

Estimation of generalized tail distortion risk measures with applications in reinsurance

2025· article· en· W4416026126 on OpenAlexafffund
Roba Bairakdar, Frédéric Godin, Mélina Mailhot, Fan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSociety of Actuaries
KeywordsReinsuranceEstimatorMeasure (data warehouse)Distortion (music)Risk measureRisk modelEstimationDynamic risk measure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present new estimators for generalized tail distortion (GTD) risk measures to assess extreme risks. Proposed estimators are based on the first‐order asymptotic expansions of the risk measure. They are simple to apply, and they are shown through simulation experiments to provide performance that is comparable or even better than that of existing estimation methods from the literature. A reinsurance premium principle based on the GTD risk measure is proposed. It is tested on car insurance claims data. We propose to use the GTD risk measure and the corresponding reinsurance premium to embed a safety loading in pricing, protecting against statistical uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of StatisticsSame topicRisk and Portfolio OptimizationFrench-language works237,207