MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416026159 · doi:10.1080/13504851.2025.2582578

Trump tariff announcement, stock market volatility and openness

2025· article· en· W4416026159 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Buigut

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Economics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsBurman University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenness to experienceTariffVolatility (finance)Stock marketStock (firearms)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the study is two-fold. First, it analyses the effect of the Trump tariffs, announced on 2 April 2025, on market return volatility. Second, it examines the factors that impact the change in volatility. In particular, the study examines how trade and financial openness, as well as export reliance on the US and Chinese markets, contribute to market volatility. To achieve this objective, daily returns from 52 market indices across 52 countries are analysed. Volatility is computed using both realized volatility and intraday price range volatility. The findings from generalized linear model estimates indicate that financial openness and financial market development significantly increase market volatility, whereas trade openness and the degree of reliance on exports to the US and China are not significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Economics LettersSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207