PalmX 2025: The First Shared Task on Benchmarking LLMs on Arabic and Islamic Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) inherently reflect the vast data distributions they encounter during their pre-training phase.As this data is predominantly sourced from the web, there is a high chance it will be skewed towards high-resourced languages and cultures, such as those of the West.Consequently, LLMs often exhibit a diminished understanding of certain communities, a gap that is particularly evident in their knowledge of Arabic and Islamic cultures.This issue becomes even more pronounced with increasingly under-represented topics.To address this critical challenge, we introduce PalmX 2025, the first shared task designed to benchmark the cultural competence of LLMs in these specific domains.The task is composed of two subtasks featuring multiplechoice questions (MCQs) in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA): General Arabic Culture and General Islamic Culture.These subtasks cover a wide range of topics, including traditions, food, history, religious practices, and language expressions from across 22 Arab countries.The initiative drew considerable interest, with 26 teams registering for Subtask 1 and 19 for Subtask 2, culminating in nine and six valid submissions, respectively.Our findings re-veal that task-specific fine-tuning substantially boosts performance over baseline models.The top-performing systems achieved an accuracy of 72.15% on cultural questions and 84.22% on Islamic knowledge.Parameter-efficient finetuning emerged as the predominant and most effective approach among participants, while the utility of data augmentation was found to be domain-dependent.Ultimately, this benchmark provides a crucial, standardized framework to guide the development of more culturally grounded and competent Arabic LLMs.Results of the shared task demonstrate that general cultural and general religious knowledge remain challenging to LLMs, motivating us to continue to offer the shared task in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".