MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416037866 · doi:10.5430/jct.v14n4p289

Effects of EPIRIS Model-Based Instructional Innovation on Thai Primary Students’ English Tense Learning

2025· article· W4416037866 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chalermsup Karanjakwut, Arnantawut Tiang-uan, Kamonwan Charunsri, Duangduen Rodjanakanvijit, Luz B. Darantinao, Saisuness Oulis, Anucha Mata

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrammarData collectionPerceptionPast tenseAnxietyCognitionIntervention (counseling)Present tenseLanguage acquisition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English tense acquisition remains a persistent challenge for Thai primary school students in EFL contexts, where traditional grammar-translation methods have proven inadequate in fostering durable form-meaning connections and active language practice. This study investigated the effects of EPIRIS model-based instructional innovation on primary students’ achievement, motivation, and perceptions related to learning English past tenses, while examining relationships between student motivation, engagement, interaction, and learning outcomes. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed with 86 participants comprising 66 primary students aged 9–12 and 20 English teachers from 10 schools in Samut Sakhon province, Thailand. The intervention consisted of a 12-hour EPIRIS-structured program delivered over two weeks, incorporating six sequential steps: elicitation, presentation, innovation use, retention practice, interaction, and summary and assessment. Data collection included pretest-posttest measures; validated questionnaires assessing motivation, engagement, and interaction; and semi-structured interviews with purposively selected participants. Results demonstrated significant improvements in student achievement with a mean gain of 6.11 points out of 20 possible points (p < .001). Participants reported high levels of motivation (M = 3.71), engagement (M = 3.64), and interaction (M = 4.60) with strong positive correlations among these constructs (r = .769 to .799). Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: transformation from passive to active learning, enhanced collaborative learning and peer support, and reduced anxiety with increased confidence. The EPIRIS model demonstrated substantial effectiveness in improving both cognitive and affective outcomes in primary EFL grammar instruction, providing initial evidence for adopting systematic, interactive, pedagogical approaches in English language education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207