MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416039221 · doi:10.1029/2024ms004905

MERCURY: A Fast and Versatile Multi‐Resolution Based Global Emulator of Compound Climate Hazards

2025· article· en· W4416039221 on OpenAlexafffund
Shruti Nath, Julie Carreau, Kai Kornhuber, Peter Pfleiderer, Carl‐Friedrich Schleussner, Philippe Naveau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeFonds de recherche du QuébecAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsEmulationClimate modelProbabilistic logicDownscalingCompoundingQuantileRelative humidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High‐impact climate damages are often driven by compounding conditions, such as elevated heat stress arising from combined high humidity and temperatures. To explore future changes in compounding hazards under several climate scenarios, climate emulators can provide light‐weight, data‐driven complements to Earth System Models (ESMs). Yet, only a few existing emulators jointly emulate multiple climate variables. We introduce MERCURY (Multi‐resolution EmulatoR for CompoUnd climate Risk analYsis), a spatio‐temporal, multi‐resolution emulator designed for compound climate risk analysis. MERCURY employs image‐compression‐based techniques for memory‐efficient emulation and consists of two main modules. The regional module represents the monthly, regional response of a given variable to yearly Global Mean Temperature using a probabilistic additive model, resolving regional cross‐correlations. The resulting regional values are then jointly disaggregated to grid‐cell level values using a lifting‐scheme operator, founded on principles of Discrete Wavelet Transforms. We demonstrate MERCURY on the humid‐heat metric, wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT), as derived from temperature and relative humidity emulations. The emulated WBGT spatial correlations correspond well to those of ESMs and the 95 and 97.5 quantiles of WBGT distributions are well captured, with an average of 5 deviation. MERCURY's setup allows for region‐specific emulations from which one can efficiently “zoom” into the grid‐cell level across multiple variables by means of the reverse lifting‐scheme operator. This circumvents the traditional problem of having to emulate complete, global‐fields of climate data and resulting storage requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207